One.We-perspective 
For Nepal, restructuring of the "we-perspective" is an important issue for politicians and intellectuals who have eyes, to be addressed in good faith. And Japan is the reverse.

For the Japanese, "we Japanese" is nature, and that something will happen, at once become apparent, to overwhelm the other, it becomes solid. For example, before and after the demise of Emperor Hirohito of Japan.Look back every time, have the chills and Zo~o. "Refrain from the total one hundred million", but I do not know who ordered what, that is contrary to the atmosphere of restraint, can not in any way. Is like a fart, such as postwar democracy, totalitarianism refrain total universally ruled every corner of the country. The Japanese, fearful that people do not look at an example to the world.

Two. However Nepal previous national integration, but how much going to be shouted or "popular sovereignty" in Nepal a "national unity" consciousness "people" has been internalized is not growth.Also "people movement" of 1990 and 2006, (although there are objections) the nature of the "mass mobilization" by the elite of various groups was strong. Nepal, modern "national consciousness" does not exist yet.

Three. The current turmoil in Nepal postmodern criticism, the place that I have brought democracy to the country of the establishment of post-modern subsumption yet this modern national consciousness, there is a root cause. Therefore, to rebuild peace in Nepal, is essential to reflect on this point, recently, finally, has come to be seen from the discussion of this perspective. For example:

? Dev Raj Dahal, "Condition of Politics and Law in Nepal, Opening Democratic Discourse for Conflict Resolution," AAMN Research and Policy Brief: 08, 2012

"In general, the" good collaboration with the consciousness we 4. Movement Constituent "in the leaders and citizens, to put aside the interests of the individual, that inclusive" system a good joint by having (we-perspective) "consciousness we barrel sovereign nation. to mosquito, compared to the leaders, "our point of view (we-perspective)" mandate to take. "(Dahal)

Five. Legal system of Nepal "and universal public nature Nisukamu Karma is based on tradition and social Nepal (duty-free private act), between the universal criteria of democracy, human rights and public Nisukamu Karma, balanced must. between these two, structural conflict · · · · is not. "(ibid)

"However, it is now claimed that post-modern principle of Nepal who is considered an absolute political race, region, class, ethnicity, politics such, to deny the historical progress and development of Nepal, Nepal human rather than a national sovereignty, and decomposed into various interest groups and social groups eventually, some things may be attributable deprive humanity of people from Nepal and universal national character. "(ibid)

Learning, education and public law "must have the ability and power to suppress fundamentalism based on a deterministic single identity, a rational appeal of public building for the masses. Redress inequality , also, to the extreme without causing mosquito problems without having to rigid identity to such an extent that cooperation and peaceful coexistence with the difficult social, should be able to wear a political solution. "(ibid)

6. Politics of post-post-modern this paper, but is quite difficult, while mainly relying on Habermas, or more accurately, one modern, Nepal is being divided into shreds by the identity politics is noted as one of the new attempt to try to rebuild as a "national" post-post-modern.

(C) Masayuki Tanigawa

Source: http://nepalreview.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/a-346/